Comments on: Mizuno MP 57 Golf Club Review

By: macleanja

macleanja — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:07:18 +0000

this guy is a clown

By: MizunoMP94

MizunoMP94 — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:29:55 +0000

so is your mam

By: Kingjne92

Kingjne92 — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:56:49 +0000

VV OH SNAP! VV

By: JoeyClown

JoeyClown — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:47:47 +0000

Would you say…that the extra ball speed could in fact be due to the graphite shaft, juiced up lofts?

By: grenerd84

grenerd84 — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:10:00 +0000

listen to the review, the shaft saves some weight but because of the construction of the nano speed cavity back, vs the mizuno “cavity” (it is more like a blade with a muscle back). cavity backs will give you more distance because the face is thinner, giving it more of a trampoline effect, whereas the mizuno will give you way more workability with the loss of a couple yards. it is basically a comparison between cavity back vs blade because mizuno’s true cavity backs are in the mx series

By: DrGolfJam

DrGolfJam — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:54:04 +0000

Why are the Mp 57s on average £200 cheaper than the Mp 52s?

By: TampaTundra

TampaTundra — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:30:14 +0000

More than likely because the 52′s are new this year, where the 57′s while they are not old by any means, have been on the market a little while.

By: Lookatthenoob

Lookatthenoob — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:21:40 +0000

they aren’t? and if they are because they are an older model?